翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Syufy Enterprises
・ United States v. The Amistad
・ United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs
・ United States v. Thomas
・ United States v. Thomas (1962)
・ United States v. Thomas (1997)
・ United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Co.
・ United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n
・ United States v. United Mine Workers of America
・ United States v. United States District Court
・ United States v. Univis Lens Co.
・ United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
・ United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
・ United States v. Vampire Nation
・ United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
United States v. Virginia
・ United States v. Vuitch
・ United States v. Wade
・ United States v. Warshak
・ United States v. Washington
・ United States v. Watson
・ United States v. Weitzenhoff
・ United States v. Wheeler
・ United States v. Wheeler (1920)
・ United States v. Wheeler (1978)
・ United States v. White
・ United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
・ United States v. Williams
・ United States v. Williams (1992)
・ United States v. Williams (disambiguation)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Virginia : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Virginia

''United States v. Virginia'', , is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down the Virginia Military Institute (VMI)'s long-standing male-only admission policy in a 7-1 decision. (Justice Clarence Thomas, whose son was enrolled at VMI at the time, recused himself.)〔
== Majority decision ==
Writing for the majority, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated that because VMI failed to show "exceedingly persuasive justification" for its sex-based admissions policy, it violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. In an attempt to satisfy equal protection requirements, the state of Virginia had proposed a parallel program for women, called the Virginia Women's Institute for Leadership (VWIL), located at Mary Baldwin College, a private liberal arts women's college.
However, Justice Ginsburg held that the VWIL would not provide women with the same type of rigorous military training, facilities, courses, faculty, financial opportunities, and/or alumni reputation and connections that VMI affords male cadets, a decision evocative of ''Sweatt v. Painter'', when the Court ruled in 1950 that segregated law schools in Texas were unconstitutional, since a newly formed black law school clearly did not provide the same benefits to its students as the state's prestigious and long-maintained white law school.〔 In her opinion, she stated that "The VWIL program is a pale shadow of VMI in terms of the range of curricular choices and faculty stature, funding, prestige, alumni support and influence."〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Virginia」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.